Here's how I see it, but I'm open to correction.
Today we have lots of "Excellent - thanks for sharing" - almost like a "Participated" trophy. Voting on the best of the month would highlight the projects that people like best.
Today we have a photo plus one or two sentences about a project. A winning project would be posted in the monthly mag as an article written in a template, including searchable key words, material, cutting blade, pattern, method, framing, finishing, tips, and any other details the author provides. The article could also include any questions/answers from the original posting. This takes some editing to get it right, so someone would need to put in a few hours/month to edit articles.
Each month could have a searchable index so you can go back to find an article. This is a little different than the search we have now.
Each month could have some continuing features, like Coffee Shop jokes, cartoons, scroll saw technology update, vendor contacts, case studies, etc.
Maybe advertisers could take turns contributing an article about their product - like an advertisement but using the article template. They could link to their own pages (hyperlinks) inside the article.
So what we'd have that we don't have today:
- a monthly (or quarterly?) issue that members could go to rather than paying a subscription for printed magazines or overseas shipping cost
- best-of-month article content in several forums that is determined by member voting
- vendor-contributed articles (like infomercials - written/video articles)
- up-to-date vendor contact and web site links
- regular features related to scroll sawing
- searchable content
- table of contents and index per issue
- downloadable printable patterns (pdf format?) for each article (no charge)
- downloadable printable patterns (pdf format?) for sale at a reasonable rate
- maybe for-fee larger format printed patterns like the magazine inserts, or instructions for having prints made locally
- paid vendor advertising
It is interesting that something like the Wood Toxicity Chart could have a link in every issue, but would consume only one block of resources (all links hit the same page), and those pages may be hosted by us or some other entity.
Editors would have to scrub the content so nobody sneaks a non-member vendor link into an article. That protects the value of the member vendors' contributions. Editing would also be needed to get the article templates reasonable complete. And Case Studies may be a special entry that talks about some problem, an approach to fix it, and the results. For example, shop safety, dust collection, electrical distribution, lighting, ventilation, bench design, saw problems, ...
Any thought from others?